Many studies have shown higher rates of problems for
children living in low SES families than for children living in higher
SES families. It has been hypothesized that neighborhood socioeconomic
disadvantage (NSD) contributes to the relatively high rates of problems
found for low SES children. Because low SES families cannot afford to
live in advantaged neighborhoods, NSD may explain or add to the risk
factors associated with low SES per se. To test the hypothesis that
NSD is associated with youths' problems after controlling for family
SES, a team of Dutch researchers sought to assess an entire birth cohort
of 2,587 youths who had been born in Rotterdam, Holland, during a particular
year and who were still living there when they were 10 to 12 ("Time
1") and 12 to 14 ("Time 2") years old (Schneiders et
al., 2003). Parents completed the CBCL and the youths completed the
YSR. For each of Rotterdam's 74 residential neighborhoods, NSD was scored
from a composite of data on the percentage of youths enrolled in education;
adults receiving welfare; residents with nonDutch nationality; unemployment;
residents moving out of the neighborhood in a 1-year period; households
with married couples and/or children; mean income; and mean age of residential
buildings. Using multi-level regression analyses, Schneiders et al.
found that NSD was significantly associated with CBCL and YSR Internalizing,
Externalizing, and Total Problems scores at both Time 1 and Time 2,
even after controlling for the SES (parental education and occupation)
of each youth's family. In addition, after controlling for Time 1 problem
scores, plus family SES, Schneiders et al. found that NSD predicted
Time-1 to Time-2 increases in Total Problems scores on the YSR at p
<.05 and on the CBCL at p <.10. Having found no significant interactions
of NSD with family SES or with child gender, Schneiders et al. concluded
that "NSD was associated with child and parent reported behavioural
problems, over and above the effect of individual level SES. Furthermore,
longitudinal results suggested that NSD may lead to an increase in problem
occurrence from late childhood into early adolescence. We found no evidence
that NSD effects differed in magnitude for children from high compared
with low SES families, or for boys compared with girls. Living in a
disadvantaged neighbourhood thus represents an independent risk factor
for children" (p. 702).
Reference
Schneiders, J., Drukker, M., van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F.C., van Os,
J., & Nicholson, N.A. (2003). Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage
and behavioural problems from late childhood into early adolescence.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 699-703.