|
Home
Products
Ordering
Information:
How
to Order
Distributors
Translations
For
Students or Training Programs
Site
and Scoring Licenses
Information
for Parents
Samples
of Forms
Multicultural
Applications
Reliability
and Validity
Information
for:
Preschool
(CBCL, C-TRF, TOF)
School-Age
(CBCL, TRF, YSR, SCICA, TOF,
DOF)
Adults
(ABCL, ASR)
Older
Adults (OABCL, OASR)
Software
(ADM, Web-Link,
iForms, WebForms
Direct, RTS, A2S)
Bibliography
Research:
About
Us:
ASEBA
Overview
ASEBA
Origins
ASEBA
Later Developments
ASEBA
Recent Advances
Support:
FAQs
Join
Listserv
Holiday
Schedule
Contact
Us
News
|
Posted
September, 2005
Relations
of Family Poverty to Problems Reported by
Parents and Teachers for Ages 2 to 8.5 Years
The U.S. National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development's (NICHD) Study
of Early Child Care and Youth Development (SECCYD) has yielded
many findings on factors affecting children's development. These
findings include relations between poverty and both cognitive
development and behavioral/emotional problems from age 2 to third
grade when the children averaged 8.5 years of age. Based on a
ratio of family income to the poverty threshold, families were
identified as: (a) never poor from the time the children were
6 months old through third grade; (b) poor when the children were
6 through 36 months old; (c) poor when the children were 54 months
old through third grade; or (d) poor during both the early and
later periods from 6 months through third grade. From age 2 to
8.5 years, children whose families were never poor had higher
cognitive scores and lower CBCL and TRF Internalizing and Externalizing
scores than children whose families were poor across the whole
period. Cognitive scores were similar for children whose families
were poor during either the early or later periods, and both these
groups obtained scores between those obtained by children whose
families were never poor or were continuously poor. However, children
whose families were poor only during the later period tended to
have higher problem scores than children whose families were poor
only during the earlier period. Low maternal education, mother
living without a partner, and maternal depressive symptoms were
found to be significant mediators of the group differences in
problem scores. In other words, these mediators accounted for
much of the association between poverty and problem scores. The
authors concluded that "early transitory poverty seems less
detrimental to children's cognitive and social development then
long-term or concurrent poverty . . . The finding of higher behavioral
problems in the late-poor group is consistent with studies showing
that changes in economic conditions lead to increased behavior
problems among young children" (p. 806).
Reference:
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early
Child Care Research network. (2005). Duration and developmental
timing of poverty and children's cognitive and social development
from birth through third grade. Child Development, 76,
795-810.
|