blank

Home
Products
Ordering Information:

  • How to Order
  • Distributors
  • Translations
  • For Students or Training Programs
  • Site and Scoring Licenses
  • Information for Parents
  • Samples of Forms
  • Multicultural Applications
  • Societies with Multicultural Scoring
  • Reliability and Validity
    Information for:
  • Preschool (CBCL-LDS, C-TRF)
  • School-Age (CBCL, TRF, YSR, SCICA,    TOF, DOF, NEW! BPM)
  • Adults (ABCL, ASR)
  • Older Adults (OABCL, OASR)
  • Software (ADM, Web-Link, WebForms Direct, RTS, A2S)
  • Bibliography
    Research:
  • About Us:
  • ASEBA Overview
  • ASEBA Origins
  • ASEBA Subsequent Developments
  • ASEBA Recent Advances

  • Support:
  • FAQs
  • Join Listserv
  • Holiday Schedule
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright, Trademarks & Disclaimers
    Contact Us
    News
  • Posted March, 2002

    National Evaluation of Mental Health Services for
    Children and Their Families

    Brigitte Manteuffel, Robert Stephens, and Rolando Santiago (2002) have published an overview of the National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health for Children and Their Families Program. This program has established systems of care for mental health services in 67 U.S. communities. The CBCL and YSR were used to assess children at intake and follow-up. Other measures included the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) completed by trained raters and the Residential-Living Environments and Placement Stability Scale (ROLES). Initial CBCL scores for over 11,000 children and YSR scores for over 7,000 youths were significantly associated with a variety of child and family risk factors. Problem scores increased significantly as the number of risk factors increased. Follow-up assessments over 2-year periods showed declines in CBCL Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems scores that were statistically significant and that were also clinically significant according to Jacobson and Truax's Reliable Change Index (RCI). Although the results indicated improvement for children who remained in the study over a 2-year period, the authors pointed out that their "evaluation was not intended to be a randomized controlled trial, limiting our understanding of the impact of system change and service delivery on children's outcomes" (p. 18). Nevertheless, coordination of assessment over so many programs serving so many children was a major advance in efforts to improve and demonstrate systems of care.

    Reference:
    Manteuffel, B., Stephens, R.L., & Santiago, R. (2002). Overview of the National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program and Summary of Current Findings. Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 5, 3-20.

    Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Achenbach