Relationships between therapists and the people they
treat have often been hypothesized to affect the outcomes of mental
health services. To test the possible effects of both youth- and parent-reported
alliances with therapists, Hawley and Weisz (2005) had 65 7- to 16-year-olds
and their parents separately complete scales assessing positive and
negative aspects of alliances with therapists who were seeing the youths
in four Los Angeles outpatient clinics. The youths also completed the
YSR and their parents completed the CBCL at intake and again 6 months,
1 year, and 2 years after intake. Information was obtained on retention
in therapy in terms of the percentage of sessions attended by family
members; the percentage of sessions that were missed or cancelled; and
ratings of the level of concurrence about termination. Satisfaction
with services was assessed by scales completed separately by youths
and their parents. It was found that retention in therapy was significantly
better when parent alliance scores were favorable than when they were
unfavorable, but youth alliance scores were not significantly related
to therapy retention. On the other hand, favorable youth alliance scores
were positively associated with good outcomes of services, as assessed
by both the YSR and CBCL. As might be expected, positive associations
were also found between favorable alliance scores and ratings of satisfaction
with therapy. The authors concluded "that both parent-therapist
and youth-therapist alliances may be important in outpatient youth mental
health services" (p. 127). However, parent-therapist alliances
may be particularly important for retaining families in therapy, whereas
youth-therapist alliances may be particularly important for achieving
reductions in problems, as reported by youths on the YSR and parents
on the CBCL.
Reference:
Hawley, K.M., & Weisz, J.R. (2005). Youth versus parent working
alliance in usual clinical care: Distinctive associations with retention,
satisfaction, and treatment outcome. Journal of Clinical Child and
Adolescent Psychology, 34, 117-128.