|
Home
Products
Ordering
Information:
How
to Order
Distributors
Translations
For
Students or Training Programs
Site
and Scoring Licenses
Information
for Parents
Samples
of Forms
Multicultural
Applications
Reliability
and Validity
Information
for:
Preschool
(CBCL, C-TRF, TOF)
School-Age
(CBCL, TRF, YSR, SCICA, TOF,
DOF)
Adults
(ABCL, ASR)
Older
Adults (OABCL, OASR)
Software
(ADM, Web-Link,
iForms, WebForms
Direct, RTS, A2S)
Bibliography
Research:
About
Us:
ASEBA
Overview
ASEBA
Origins
ASEBA
Later Developments
ASEBA
Recent Advances
Support:
FAQs
Join
Listserv
Holiday
Schedule
Contact
Us
News
|
Posted
August, 2003
Genetic
and Environmental Effects on Aggressive and
Rule-Breaking Behavior: Longitudinal Findings for
Swedish Twins in Childhood and Adolescence
Diagnostic
systems such as DSM-IV typically combine aggressive behavior problems
with rule-breaking behavior into a single diagnostic category
of Conduct Disorder. However, empirically based studies have identified
a syndrome of aggressive behavior (e.g., fighting, attacking people)
and a separate syndrome of rule-breaking behavior (e.g., lying,
stealing, truancy). Although aggressive behavior often correlates
significantly with rule-breaking behavior, longitudinal studies
have shown that the two syndromes follow different developmental
paths. In addition, genetic factors have been found to influence
aggressive behavior more than rule-breaking behavior. To illuminate
relations between genetic factors and the developmental courses
of the different kinds of conduct problems, Eley, Lichtenstein,
and Moffitt (2003) performed genetic analyses of CBCL Aggressive
Behavior and Delinquent Behavior (now called Rule-Breaking Behavior)
syndrome scores for over 2,000 Swedish twins at ages 8-9 and 13-14.
The genetic analyses indicated "that continuity in aggressive
ASB (antisocial behavior) was largely influenced by genetic factors,
whereas continuity in nonaggressive ASB resulted from both genetic
and shared environmental factors" (p. 400). Because longitudinal
data are seldom available for making decisions in specific cases,
Eley et al. concluded that "it may be necessary to rely on
the phenotypic heterogeneity in young people's antisocial behaviors
in order to define diagnostic subtypes" and that their study
"provides discriminant validity for the etiology of these
behaviorally defined subtypes" (p. 400).
Reference:
Eley, T. C., Lichtenstein, P., & Moffitt, T.E. (2003). A longitudinal
behavioral genetic analysis of the etiology of aggressive and
nonaggressive antisocial behavior. Development and Psychopathology,
15, 383-402.
|