|
Home
Products
Ordering
Information:
How
to Order
Distributors
Translations
For
Students or Training Programs
Site
and Scoring Licenses
Information
for Parents
Samples
of Forms
Multicultural
Applications
Reliability
and Validity
Information
for:
Preschool
(CBCL-LDS, C-TRF, TOF)
School-Age
(CBCL, TRF, YSR, SCICA, TOF,
DOF, NEW! BPM)
Adults
(ABCL, ASR)
Older
Adults (OABCL, OASR)
Software
(ADM, Web-Link,
iForms, WebForms
Direct, RTS, A2S)
Bibliography
Research:
About
Us:
ASEBA
Overview
ASEBA
Origins
ASEBA
Subsequent Developments
ASEBA
Recent Advances
Support:
FAQs
Join
Listserv
Holiday
Schedule
Privacy
Policy
Copyright,
Trademarks & Disclaimers
Contact
Us
News
|
Posted
March, 2010
Interactive
Effects of Structured Parenting and Genetic Risk on Toddlers'
Behavior Problems
Most
mental health workers acknowledge that behavior problems are
shaped by both environmental
and genetic factors. Leve et al. (2009) tested the hypothesis
that a particular kind of environmental input-structured parenting-would
have different effects on children at high vs. low genetic
risk for psychopathology. They did this by studying adopted
children whose birth parents had completed questionnaires
regarding their own substance use, antisocial behavior, depression,
and anxiety. Scores for these variables were standardized
and averaged to produce global measures of psychopathology
for birth mothers of 290 children and birth fathers of 95
of the children. As the children were adopted at a mean age
of 3 days, they experienced little environmental input from
their birth parents. When the children were 18 months old,
each adoptive mother-child dyad was videoed in a standardized
clean-up task. The videos were then rated for the degree to
which mothers structured their child's behavior. Mothers also
completed the CBCL/1½-5. A striking interaction was
found between scores for birth parents' psychopathology and
scores for adoptive mothers' structured parenting: The highest
18-month CBCL Total Problems scores were found for children
whose birth parents (analyzed separately for birth mothers
and fathers) obtained high psychopathology scores and
whose adoptive mothers obtained low scores for structured
parenting. By contrast, low CBCL Total Problems scores
were found for children whose birth parents obtained high
psychopathology scores and whose adoptive mothers obtained
high scores for structured parenting. In other words,
structured parenting by adoptive mothers appeared to strongly
counteract genetic risks associated with birth parents' psychopathology.
For children whose birth parents obtained low scores
for psychopathology, the opposite relation was found
between CBCL Total Problems scores and adoptive mothers' structured
parenting: CBCL Total Problems scores were significantly higher
for children whose adoptive mothers were rated high
on structured parenting than for children whose mothers were
rated low on structured parenting. Structured parenting
thus appeared to increase problems among children at
low genetic risk for psychopathology, whereas structured parenting
decreased problems among high-risk children. Leve et
al. concluded that the interacting effects of genetic risk
and structured parenting reflected different pathways toward
low vs. high problems at age 18 months: Both genetic risk
and structured parenting may thus affect problem levels, but
the effects of genetic risk may be modified by structured
parenting and vice versa.
Reference:
Leve, L.D., Harold, G.T., Ge, X., Neiderhiser, J.M., Shaw,
D., Scaramella, L.V., & Reiss, D. (2009). Structured parenting
of toddlers at high versus low genetic risk: Two pathways
to child problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 1102-1109.
|