|
Home
Products
Ordering
Information:
How
to Order
Distributors
Translations
For
Students or Training Programs
Site
and Scoring Licenses
Information
for Parents
Samples
of Forms
Multicultural
Applications
Reliability
and Validity
Information
for:
Preschool
(CBCL, C-TRF, TOF)
School-Age
(CBCL, TRF, YSR, SCICA, TOF,
DOF)
Adults
(ABCL, ASR)
Older
Adults (OABCL, OASR)
Software
(ADM, Web-Link,
iForms, WebForms
Direct, RTS, A2S)
Bibliography
Research:
About
Us:
ASEBA
Overview
ASEBA
Origins
ASEBA
Later Developments
ASEBA
Recent Advances
Support:
FAQs
Join
Listserv
Holiday
Schedule
Contact
Us
News
|
Posted
August, 2006
CBCL
Profile Patterns Obtained by Spanish Children with Depressive
Disorders, Conduct Disorders, or Comorbid Depressive
and Conduct Disorders
Many
children who meet criteria for a particular diagnosis
also meet criteria for other diagnoses. To determine
whether children who meet criteria for both depressive
and conduct disorders differ in important ways from
children who meet criteria for only one of these categories
of diagnoses, Ezpeleta et al. (2006) identified 382
8- to 17-year-olds attending outpatient psychiatric
clinics in Barcelona, Spain, who met DSM-IV criteria
for major depressive disorder (MDD), dysthmic disorder
(DD), conduct disorder (CD), or oppositional defiant
disorder (ODD). They assessed the children with the
Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA),
the Children's Global Assessment Scale (GAS), the Child
and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale, the Columbia
Impairment Scale, and the CBCL. Scores were then compared
for children who met criteria only for MDD/DD, only
ODD/CD, or both categories of diagnoses. Differences
between the prevalence rates for 39 different symptoms
in the three groups did not exceed chance expectations
for children having only one type of disorder versus
children having both types of disorders. Comparison
of 32 DSM symptoms of ADHD, Separation Anxiety Disorder,
and Generalized Anxiety Disorder also showed no differences
exceeding chance expectations. However, the comorbid
group obtained significantly worse scores on measures
of impairment. On the CBCL, the comorbid group obtained
significantly higher scores than the depressed group
on 8 of the 11 problem scales that were analyzed and
than the conduct disorder group on 3 of the 11 CBCL
problem scales. Profiles of mean standard scores on
the CBCL problem scales showed much higher scores for
the comorbid group than for the depressive group on
the Social Problems, Thought Problems, Attention Problems,
Rule-Breaking, Aggressive Behavior, Externalizing, and
Total Problems scales. The comorbid group's scores exceeded
those of the conduct disorder group's scores by the
greatest amount on the Anxious/Depressed and Internalizing
scales . The differences between the comorbid and other
groups were negligible in terms of DSM symptom criteria
and were minimal in terms of the impairment measures.
However, the CBCL profiles revealed numerous large differences
between the depressive and comorbid groups.
Reference:
Ezpeleta, L., Domench, J.M., & Angold, A. (2006).
A Comparison of Pure and Comorbid CD/ODD and Depression.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47,
704-712.
|