Led by Judy Dunn of the Institute of Psychiatry's Social
Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Center, a team of British
researchers studied family drawings done by 180 5- to 7-year-olds (Dunn,
O'Connor, & Levy, 2002). The children lived with a single mother,
a step parent and a birth parent, or both birth parents. The researchers
assessed the children's drawings for developmental level, the number
of family members who were excluded from the drawing, and whether cohabiting
parents were drawn within the same group. The children's problems were
assessed with CBCLs completed by parents and TRFs completed by teachers.
Dunn et al. found no relation between the type of family and the developmental
level of the children's drawings. However, they did find that children
living with both birth parents drew all family members and grouped their
parents together significantly more often than children living in step-parent
families. In addition, children who excluded siblings from their drawings
obtained significantly higher CBCL Internalizing and Externalizing scores
(based on the mean of CBCL ratings by both parents) and significantly
higher TRF Externalizing scores than children who included all their
siblings. Furthermore, children who drew their parents apart obtained
significantly higher CBCL Externalizing scores than children who drew
their parents together. Dunn et al. concluded that there was "robust
evidence for an association between exclusions and parent and teacher
reports of behavioral or emotional problems; links between parent togetherness
and child adjustment were also found but were less robust. Given that
construct validation has been very limited or nonexistent in previous
studies of children's drawings, this is an important finding" (p.
510).
Reference:
Dunn, J., O'Connor, T.G., & Levy, I. (2002). Out of the picture:
A study of family drawings by children from step-, single-parent, and
non-step families. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,
31, 505-512.