A team of Dutch researchers tested the applicability
of the CBCL and TRF to 1,041 6- to 18-year-olds attending nonresidential
schools for children with ID in the educable range (IQ 60 to 80) or
trainable range (IQ 30 to 60; Dekker et al., 2002). They compared scores
and psychometric data for the ID children with scores and psychometric
data for a national sample of 1,855 children. Internal consistencies
for scale scores were very similar for both groups of children with
ID and the children without ID: Cronbach's alphas ranged from .52 to
.90 for children with ID and from .47 to .94 for children without ID.
Correlations between CBCL and TRF Total Problems scores for children
with and without ID ranged from .30 to .34. The 1-year stability of
Total Problems scores was .79 for educable children and .72 for trainable
children. Although the CBCL and TRF were not specifically designed for
children with ID, they correlated .83 to .88 with the parent and teacher
versions of the Developmental Behavior Checklist, which was designed
for children with ID. To identify areas in which children with ID had
more behavioral, emotional, or social problems than children without
ID, Dekker et al. compared item and scale scores for the different groups.
Educable children obtained significantly higher scores on all CBCL and
TRF problem scales than children without ID, while trainable children
obtained significantly higher scores on all but the CBCL Anxious/Depressed
and TRF Somatic Complaints scales. Dekker et al. also did detailed analyses
of all the specific problem items that were reported significantly more
often for children with ID than without ID. About 50% of the children
with ID were found to have deviant Total Problems scores, compared to
18% of children without ID. The prevalence rate for deviant scores among
children with ID was similar to the prevalence rate obtained with different
measures in other studies. Dekker et al. concluded that "The advantage
of using CBCL and TRF norm scores, which are now available for children
with ID as a result of this study, is that it will allow clinicians
and researchers to make comparisons to children with similar levels
of ID, with non-ID children from the general population, as well as
to referred, non-ID children" (p. 1096).
Reference:
Dekker, M.C., Koot, H.M., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F.C. (2002).
Emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents with and
without intellectual disability. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 43, 1087-1098.