|
Home
Products
Ordering
Information:
How
to Order
Distributors
Translations
For
Students or Training Programs
Site
and Scoring Licenses
Information
for Parents
Samples
of Forms
Multicultural
Applications
Reliability
and Validity
Information
for:
Preschool
(CBCL, C-TRF, TOF)
School-Age
(CBCL, TRF, YSR, SCICA, TOF,
DOF)
Adults
(ABCL, ASR)
Older
Adults (OABCL, OASR)
Software
(ADM, Web-Link,
iForms, WebForms
Direct, RTS, A2S)
Bibliography
Research:
About
Us:
ASEBA
Overview
ASEBA
Origins
ASEBA
Later Developments
ASEBA
Recent Advances
Support:
FAQs
Join
Listserv
Holiday
Schedule
Contact
Us
News
|
Posted October, 2003
Genetic
Effects on Antisocial Behavior Among 5-Year-Old
British Twins Assessed by Multiple Informants
Previous studies
have reported significant heritabilities for aggressive behavior
in children and adolescents. Most of these studies have used data
from only one source, such as ratings by parents. Because questions
have been raised about potential biases in data obtained from
parents and other kinds of informants, a team of researchers at
the Institute of Psychiatry in London evaluated the contributions
of four sources of data to tests of genetic effects on young children's
antisocial behavior (Arsenault et al., 2003). The children were
2,232 5-year-old British twins who were participating in the Environmental
Risk (E-risk) Longitudinal Twin Study. The assessment data included
mothers' CBCL ratings, teachers' TRF ratings, ratings by examiners
who observed the children in standardized situations, and children's
self-reports obtained in puppet interviews where each child identified
puppets whose behavior was most like the child's own behavior.
Correlations between scores obtained from the different informants
(mothers, teachers, observers, children) were similar to the low
correlations found between these combinations of informants in
meta-analyses of many studies. However, complex statistical analyses
indicated that antisocial behavior agreed upon by all types of
informants (i.e., antisocial behavior that was observed in multiple
contexts) was highly heritable, yielding a heritability estimate
of 82%. Furthermore, the low correlations among scores from different
informants did not result from biases in the informants' ratings.
Instead, the variations in antisocial behavior that were specific
to reports by each type of informant were influenced by genetic
factors. In other words, the low correlations between informants'
reports resulted from the fact that each type of informant validly
captured different, genetically influenced aspects of children's
antisocial behavior. These different aspects of antisocial behavior
that were detected by each type of informant were thus in addition
to the genetically influenced aspects of antisocial behavior that
were consistent across multiple informants and the contexts to
which their ratings referred. Arsenault et al. concluded that
"researchers studying children's behavior disorders should
try to collect data from different sources," and that "using
all the information from each rater to create composite scores
will capture more meaningful variation than restricting composites
to only the information agreed upon by all raters" (p. 844).
Reference:
Arsenault, L., Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Rijsdijk,
F.V., Jaffee, S.R., Ablow, J.C, & Measelle, J.R. (2003). Strong
genetic effects on cross-situational antisocial behaviour among
5-year-old children according to mothers, teachers, examiner-observers,
and twins' self-reports. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
44, 832-848.
|